PLEASER - Amuse-20 Eternal Classic Court Shoe Seductive Foot Arch Arch Foot 0a1983

PLEASER - Amuse-20 Eternal Classic Court Shoe Seductive Foot Arch Arch Foot 0a1983PLEASER - Amuse-20 Eternal Classic Court Shoe Seductive Foot Arch Arch Foot 0a1983PLEASER - Amuse-20 Eternal Classic Court Shoe Seductive Foot Arch Arch Foot 0a1983
llehctiM nosaJ
esuoH nrubkcalB 1
enaL yresruN
erihskroY tseW
modgniK detinU
:enohP865 559 29370

Item specifics

New with box: 你 in its original packaging (such as the original box ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Court Shoes
Brand: Pleaser Heel Height: Very High Heel (4 1/2 in or More)
Heel Type: Stiletto
Update required: To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
Close Player

PLEASER - Amuse-20 Eternal Classic Court Shoe Seductive Foot Arch Arch Foot 0a1983

Gentleman/Lady Brand new swedish handmade clogs Charming design discount price Rich on-time delivery,SERGIO ROSSI SHOES BALLET SANDALS leather silver 37 7,Womens Clarks Bow Detailed Block Heel Shoes 'Orabella Lily'Gentleman/Lady Shoes We have won praise from our customers. real International big name,New Balance wcoasgp2 Vazee Coast Trainers Purple 180693Aldo Womens Thiasa Leather Open Toe Mules, Cognac, Size 9.0 US / 7 UK,Franchetti Bond Made In Italy Womens Brown Suede & Leather Shoes (Euro 40),Men/Women Karen Millen Shoes Size 6 (39) Big clearance sale Preferred material British temperamentFaith Womens Black Ankle Buckle Open Toe Flower Designed Heeled Sandals U.K. 6,Pleaser KISS-201 Chrome Plated Platform Slide Women's Clear/Turquoise Chrome,Sexy Ladies Pointy Toe Shoes Buckle Strap Faux Sheepskin Mid Heels Pull On Sizes,Silver glitter high heels Ankle Boots Size 7,Jessica Simpson Womens Charie Pointed Toe D-orsay Pumps,Mary Janes Ladies Pumps Shoes High Platform Wedge Heels Ankle Strap Casual Suede,Pleaser Platform Two Band Slide Clear/Neon Multi Rhinestones,s.Oliver Womens 24404 Closed Toe Heels, Graphite Silver (Pewter Metal. 954),Gabor red suede wedge heeledl mules, G/G, RRP .00, BNWB,Pleaser Rhinestone Filled Bottom Platform Slide Clear/Gold Rhinestones,Women's Pumps High Heels Pointy Toe Multi-buckle Sexy OL Banquet Dress Shoes SZ,Alexander McQueen for Puma Sky High Hidden Wedge with Spike Studs 8.5,Man/Woman Ladies Solidea Shoes (From Italy) Customer first Clearance Quality and consumer first,salvatore ferragamo brand new sandal wedge with original box UK4 US6.5,Gabor Vesta 2, Women's Closed-Toe Pumps, Off White Pearlised Leather 5 EUMen's/Women's nike m2k tekno Comfortable feeling Win highly appreciated Lightweight shoes#cage #heels #fashion #style #kimkardashian #kyliejenner #jlo,Miista red genuine leather purple platform chunky heels goth punk size 7Panther 2528100la _ 37Frazer S3Work Shoe, Size 37, Black,New With Box Leather Aldo Animal Print Wedge Size 4,Womens Rieker Heeled Casual Shoes - 43790,BENJAMIN ADAMS - Pink Blush Satin heels with Crystal Diamonds eu40 us8 uk7,


PLEASER - Amuse-20 Eternal Classic Court Shoe Seductive Foot Arch Arch Foot 0a1983

By Sam Brasch | May 29, 2018

Audio: Sam Brasch discusses proposed changes to the state's Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program

The Mesa County Workforce Center building in 2015. Colorado's counties are opposing a statewide move to increase temporary welfare.

Megan Verlee/CPR News

A state plan to increase cash welfare for the first time in nearly a decade is meeting resistance from Colorado counties.

Their objection lies not with the need for an increase, but how to pay for it.

Colorado's Department of Human Services proposed a 10 percent increase for families that receive cash welfare through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. That amounts to an extra $46 above the current limit of $462 a month for a family with one parent and two kids.

That increase would benefit about 17,000 Colorado households that receive cash assistance each month. An additional 34,500 receive assistance over the course of a year.

There are restrictions on the benefits. Adults must participate in classes or skill-based trainings designed to help them get a job, and no family can receive grants for more than 60 months.

Counties Want To Guard Savings

The issue for counties is the plan to fund the increase. The proposal would force counties to spend the allocation on cash assistance, rather than keeping it in reserves. Counties often store part of their allocation for basic cash assistance to help pay for other programs, like child welfare or childcare assistance.

Julie Krow, executive director for El Paso County Department of Human Services, said both sides agree Colorado’s poorest families could use the help, but she doesn’t think it should come at the expense of other programs.

“Would any parent ever feel comfortable having no savings in the bank to meet their own children’s needs?” Krow said. “We have legal custody of many of the children in our child welfare system. If these children have a critical emergency or an expensive treatment need, it is the county that covers the expense.”

Colorado Counties, Inc., which represents the 64 counties on state issues, has also come out against the planned increased.

The State Sees Underspent Funds

The Colorado Department of Human Services argues counties would not need to tap their reserves. The department estimates the cost of the increase would come to $8.1 million — less than the $10.3 million of TANF money counties socked away during the last fiscal year. In total, Colorado counties have set aside about $50 million in money from the cash welfare program.

“All we are asking is that we use underspent money to help families in deep pockets of poverty,” said Ki’i Powell, executive director of the Office of Economic Security at CDHS.

Colorado last increased the caps for the grants given through its program, known as Colorado Works, in 2009. Even before that, the overall value of the program struggled to keep up with inflation or the cost of living. Since the beginning of the program inception in 1997, the Department of Human Services estimates that the purchasing power of the grants has fallen 35 percent.

Gini Pingenot, legislative director for the Colorado Counties Inc., said many Colorado counties have already committed their TANF reserves for other programs. Data collected by Colorado Counties shows that by year’s end, 15 counties will have zeroed-out their reserves — even without the proposed increase.

“I don’t know how we will fulfill what’s a really laudable effort,” Pingenot said.

The debate comes as Congress considers a new plan for welfare reform. The Republican-led effort would continue the TANF program for five years while allowing states to use more of its welfare funding for child care and job training.

In Colorado, county advocates say the state shouldn’t act before Washington. But those pushing for the increase are worried the lack of action may send the wrong message to Congress.

“They would think we don’t need to fund this program as much as we are when that could not be further from the truth,” said attorney Jack Regenbogen, who has advocated for the increase on behalf the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, an anti-poverty group.

The state Board of Human Services begins debate on the issue at a June 1 meeting.

State Government
Donate To CPR

Support impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery with your monthly gift today.

npr news

NPR Hourly News


CPR Hourly News


CPR's 2018 Voter's Guide

A resource to help you decide how to cast your vote this election season.

Thank You For Joining CPR's Community Of Support

Your gifts strengthen the foundation for impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery in Colorado.

Most Viewed News

Public Insight Network