Miu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407d

Miu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407dMiu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407d

Item specifics

Condition: :
. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller notes: good condition with slight damage to heels.See photo 12
Main Colour: Silver Toe Type: Round Toe
Brand: Miu Miu Style: Comfort
Shoe Size: UK 4/EU 36.5/US 6 Look: comfort
Occasion: Casual Upper Material: 100% Leather
Sole: leather and rubber Pattern: studded
Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy Width: Standard (B)
Size Type: Regular
Update required: To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
Close Player

Miu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407d

Clarks Women’s Glick Shine Oxfords Beige (Nude Leather) 6,NIKE STUDIO TRAINER 2 684897-015 CNB684897-015 Czarny - Zoki - Matter - Shoes,Nike Wmns Air Force 1 Mid 07 366731100 white over-the-ankleBrunello Cucinelli Women's slip on fringe loafer 40 Cream Leather New in box,Ladies Remonte Casual Shoes D0101 Adequate supply and timely delivery online shop General product,Jenny Womens Pisa Closed Toe Ballet Flats, Blue, 4.5 UKNike Blazer Low Lx Womens Trainers Aa2017 Sneakers Shoes 003British Mens Dress Leather shoes Pointed Toe Chunky heel Buckle strap Wedding Sztods shoes suede ladies loafer Elegant appearance excellent Fashion dynamicRollbab CL223 Ballerina Leather White 181982 New market a good reputation in the world Preferential priceLadies Remonte Casual Shoes D1636 Clearance price Ranked first in its class Various,HGL Womens 3-10 3205 7500 Wedge Sandals Gold (Platin7500) 8.5 UK,SHOES STONEFLY ANKLE BOOT SKIN AND PAINT 210264 BLACK tg38,Tod’s Gommino Heaven Driving Shoe Good design Cheaper than the price General product,Man's/Woman's NEW SKECHERS WOMENS GO STEP LITE ORIGIN COMFORTABLE CASUAL SHOES Crazy price, Birmingham Quality and quantity guaranteed Selling new products WW519,AUTHENTIC JIMMY CHOO WILLOW SUEDE STAR STUDDED FLATS BLACK GRADE B USED - HP,Ladies Clarks Flats The Style - Busby FollyComme des garcons size 4 patent shoes,Gabor Womens Comfort Sport Derbys Black (Schwarz Ss/C 88) 4.5 UK,Susy Loafers Slipper Low-Shoe Fish City Shoes 37 38 41 Silver Leather Np 219 Newara Womens Bari Closed Toe Ballet Flats, Blau Weite F1/2 Blue (Blue) 8.5 UK,Ladies Remonte Flat Casual Shoes R1704 High quality and low overhead At a lower price Recommended today,Fendi Womens Ballet Shoes Size 5 Eu Size 38 used once Great condition,Ladies Clarks Cloud Steppers Step Allena Bay Casual Slip On Shoes,Man/Woman NEW SKECHERS WOMENS EZ FLEX 3.0 DUCHESS MEMORY FOAM SLIP ON CASUAL SHOES Best-selling worldwide Primary quality Tide shoes list VW530,Frankie Model classic shoes elegant englishwomen casual leather men 41 42 43 44,HGL Womens 5-10 2104 0100 Sling Back Heels, Black Black (Schwarz 0100) 4 UK,Gabor Womens Fashion Ballet Flats, One Size White (Weiss 21) 2.5 UKWomens Pikolinos 655-1572 Leather Casual Bar Shoes,BNIB Calvin Klein Platform Silver Natalye Rock Metal Shoes / 40 & / 36,
Streaming

Menu

Miu Miu Silver Studded Black Shiny Patent Leather On Slip On Leather Shoes SZ 36.5 28407d

By Sam Brasch | sam.brasch@cpr.org May 29, 2018

Audio: Sam Brasch discusses proposed changes to the state's Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program

The Mesa County Workforce Center building in 2015. Colorado's counties are opposing a statewide move to increase temporary welfare.

Megan Verlee/CPR News

A state plan to increase cash welfare for the first time in nearly a decade is meeting resistance from Colorado counties.

Their objection lies not with the need for an increase, but how to pay for it.

Colorado's Department of Human Services proposed a 10 percent increase for families that receive cash welfare through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. That amounts to an extra $46 above the current limit of $462 a month for a family with one parent and two kids.

That increase would benefit about 17,000 Colorado households that receive cash assistance each month. An additional 34,500 receive assistance over the course of a year.

There are restrictions on the benefits. Adults must participate in classes or skill-based trainings designed to help them get a job, and no family can receive grants for more than 60 months.

Counties Want To Guard Savings

The issue for counties is the plan to fund the increase. The proposal would force counties to spend the allocation on cash assistance, rather than keeping it in reserves. Counties often store part of their allocation for basic cash assistance to help pay for other programs, like child welfare or childcare assistance.

Julie Krow, executive director for El Paso County Department of Human Services, said both sides agree Colorado’s poorest families could use the help, but she doesn’t think it should come at the expense of other programs.

“Would any parent ever feel comfortable having no savings in the bank to meet their own children’s needs?” Krow said. “We have legal custody of many of the children in our child welfare system. If these children have a critical emergency or an expensive treatment need, it is the county that covers the expense.”

Colorado Counties, Inc., which represents the 64 counties on state issues, has also come out against the planned increased.

The State Sees Underspent Funds

The Colorado Department of Human Services argues counties would not need to tap their reserves. The department estimates the cost of the increase would come to $8.1 million — less than the $10.3 million of TANF money counties socked away during the last fiscal year. In total, Colorado counties have set aside about $50 million in money from the cash welfare program.

“All we are asking is that we use underspent money to help families in deep pockets of poverty,” said Ki’i Powell, executive director of the Office of Economic Security at CDHS.

Colorado last increased the caps for the grants given through its program, known as Colorado Works, in 2009. Even before that, the overall value of the program struggled to keep up with inflation or the cost of living. Since the beginning of the program inception in 1997, the Department of Human Services estimates that the purchasing power of the grants has fallen 35 percent.

Gini Pingenot, legislative director for the Colorado Counties Inc., said many Colorado counties have already committed their TANF reserves for other programs. Data collected by Colorado Counties shows that by year’s end, 15 counties will have zeroed-out their reserves — even without the proposed increase.

“I don’t know how we will fulfill what’s a really laudable effort,” Pingenot said.

The debate comes as Congress considers a new plan for welfare reform. The Republican-led effort would continue the TANF program for five years while allowing states to use more of its welfare funding for child care and job training.

In Colorado, county advocates say the state shouldn’t act before Washington. But those pushing for the increase are worried the lack of action may send the wrong message to Congress.

“They would think we don’t need to fund this program as much as we are when that could not be further from the truth,” said attorney Jack Regenbogen, who has advocated for the increase on behalf the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, an anti-poverty group.

The state Board of Human Services begins debate on the issue at a June 1 meeting.

State Government
Donate To CPR

Support impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery with your monthly gift today.

npr news

NPR Hourly News

Listen

CPR Hourly News

Listen

CPR's 2018 Voter's Guide

A resource to help you decide how to cast your vote this election season.

Thank You For Joining CPR's Community Of Support

Your gifts strengthen the foundation for impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery in Colorado.

Most Viewed News

Public Insight Network