Christian Louboutin Louboutin Christian Predator 4a Python Suede Grey Ankle Boots 39 a497b9

Christian Louboutin Louboutin Christian Predator 4a Python Suede Grey Ankle Boots 39 a497b9
letaP atreboR
evirD rehgiH 46
daetsnaB
xeselddiM
QP1 7MS
modgniK detinU
:enohP5426139697440
:liamEmoc.liamtoh@letapatrebor

Item specifics

Condition:
: . See the seller’s listing for full details and description of ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Christian Louboutin
Width: X-Narrow (4A) Boot Shaft Height: Ankle
Shoe Size: UK 6 Upper Material: Suede
Main Colour: Grey Material: Suede
Update required: To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
Close Player

Christian Louboutin Louboutin Christian Predator 4a Python Suede Grey Ankle Boots 39 a497b9

Via Spiga Womens Boots Black Suede 6.5 US / 4.5 UK,Ladies Rieker Flat Shoes The Style - L1763Gentlemen/Ladies Booties Jeffrey Campbell Long-term reputation Online Perfect processing,PHILIPPE MODEL AMPHIBIAN FOOTWEAR WOMAN ANKLE BOOT LEATHER BORDEAUX - 0A74GIOHEL 5CM PLATFORM KNEE HIGH BOOTS STIEFEL BOOTS STRETCH CORSET BLACK BLACK 35,AUTHENTIC CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN SUEDE BOOTIES PINK GRADE AB USED -AT,Remonte Womens D3180 Boots Multicolor (Schwarz/Chianti/Graphit/Schwarz) 5 UK,Womens Crocs at Work, Relaxed Fit. Colour white. Slip Resistant Tread. SIZE 7Pleaser Womens DELIGHT-3000 Unlined Classic Boots Long Length 7 UKBT09 MOMA shoes grey green suede leather women ankle bootsGentlemen/Ladies Booties Elena Iachi Velvet Elegant shape Year-end sale Elegant and solemn,AUTHENTIC FENDI LEATHER LONG BOOTS 8W4127 DARK BROWN GRADE AB USED - AT,Yves Saint Laurent YSL Tribute Patent Heel Ankle Bootie Boot Heels 39 BNWB,AZZEDINE ALAIA SUEDE CUT OUT ANKLE BOOTS 38,Dr. Martens 1b99, Womens Ankle Boots Black (Black 008) 3 UKNike Air Max Plus Tn La Requin The Shark Black White GS BG Juniors Girls Boys,Lee Cooper Steel Toe Cap Safety Shoe. The Best Looking Ladies Work Trainer. bootBD 84733 Red Laura Biagiotti Shoes low Laura Biagiotti Woman red 84733 S,Butterfly Twists Jacqui Union Jack Folding Ballerinas Size 3,Womens Butterfly Twists Maya Rose Gold Glitter Flat Espadrille Shoes Sz SizeRockport Christy Womens Boots Tan Leather 5.5 US / 3.5 UK,Women's Fashion Pearls Furry Shoes Slippers Mules Flat Heels Opent Toe Sandals,Art Womens Grass Ankle Boots Black 4 UKLadies Clarks Shoes Sillian Tino Complete specification comfortability Amoy,Ganter Womens Ellen-Stiefel-g Boots Black (Schwarz 01000) 6.5 UK,BNIB Womens ~ Nike Air Max 90 Premium Winter Trainers Shoes | 880302-700Marco Tozzi Womens 24232 Loafers Blue (Navy 805) 6 UK,P-345971 New Saint Laurent Rubber Rain boot Khaki Shoe US 9 Marked 39,Saint Laurent Women's Ankle Boots Black Suede Booties Size 38.5 RRP,Shires Norfolk Boot Ladies Riding Boots REF Da150*
Streaming

Menu

Christian Louboutin Louboutin Christian Predator 4a Python Suede Grey Ankle Boots 39 a497b9

By Sam Brasch | sam.brasch@cpr.org May 29, 2018

Audio: Sam Brasch discusses proposed changes to the state's Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program

The Mesa County Workforce Center building in 2015. Colorado's counties are opposing a statewide move to increase temporary welfare.

Megan Verlee/CPR News

A state plan to increase cash welfare for the first time in nearly a decade is meeting resistance from Colorado counties.

Their objection lies not with the need for an increase, but how to pay for it.

Colorado's Department of Human Services proposed a 10 percent increase for families that receive cash welfare through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. That amounts to an extra $46 above the current limit of $462 a month for a family with one parent and two kids.

That increase would benefit about 17,000 Colorado households that receive cash assistance each month. An additional 34,500 receive assistance over the course of a year.

There are restrictions on the benefits. Adults must participate in classes or skill-based trainings designed to help them get a job, and no family can receive grants for more than 60 months.

Counties Want To Guard Savings

The issue for counties is the plan to fund the increase. The proposal would force counties to spend the allocation on cash assistance, rather than keeping it in reserves. Counties often store part of their allocation for basic cash assistance to help pay for other programs, like child welfare or childcare assistance.

Julie Krow, executive director for El Paso County Department of Human Services, said both sides agree Colorado’s poorest families could use the help, but she doesn’t think it should come at the expense of other programs.

“Would any parent ever feel comfortable having no savings in the bank to meet their own children’s needs?” Krow said. “We have legal custody of many of the children in our child welfare system. If these children have a critical emergency or an expensive treatment need, it is the county that covers the expense.”

Colorado Counties, Inc., which represents the 64 counties on state issues, has also come out against the planned increased.

The State Sees Underspent Funds

The Colorado Department of Human Services argues counties would not need to tap their reserves. The department estimates the cost of the increase would come to $8.1 million — less than the $10.3 million of TANF money counties socked away during the last fiscal year. In total, Colorado counties have set aside about $50 million in money from the cash welfare program.

“All we are asking is that we use underspent money to help families in deep pockets of poverty,” said Ki’i Powell, executive director of the Office of Economic Security at CDHS.

Colorado last increased the caps for the grants given through its program, known as Colorado Works, in 2009. Even before that, the overall value of the program struggled to keep up with inflation or the cost of living. Since the beginning of the program inception in 1997, the Department of Human Services estimates that the purchasing power of the grants has fallen 35 percent.

Gini Pingenot, legislative director for the Colorado Counties Inc., said many Colorado counties have already committed their TANF reserves for other programs. Data collected by Colorado Counties shows that by year’s end, 15 counties will have zeroed-out their reserves — even without the proposed increase.

“I don’t know how we will fulfill what’s a really laudable effort,” Pingenot said.

The debate comes as Congress considers a new plan for welfare reform. The Republican-led effort would continue the TANF program for five years while allowing states to use more of its welfare funding for child care and job training.

In Colorado, county advocates say the state shouldn’t act before Washington. But those pushing for the increase are worried the lack of action may send the wrong message to Congress.

“They would think we don’t need to fund this program as much as we are when that could not be further from the truth,” said attorney Jack Regenbogen, who has advocated for the increase on behalf the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, an anti-poverty group.

The state Board of Human Services begins debate on the issue at a June 1 meeting.

State Government
Donate To CPR

Support impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery with your monthly gift today.

npr news

NPR Hourly News

Listen

CPR Hourly News

Listen

CPR's 2018 Voter's Guide

A resource to help you decide how to cast your vote this election season.

Thank You For Joining CPR's Community Of Support

Your gifts strengthen the foundation for impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery in Colorado.

Most Viewed News

Public Insight Network