Justin Reece England Camila Womens Black Suede Suede Black Leather Shoes 0d3689

Justin Reece England Camila Womens Black Suede Suede Black Leather Shoes 0d3689
Update required: To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
Close Player

Justin Reece England Camila Womens Black Suede Suede Black Leather Shoes 0d3689

Fly London Sien, Women's Short Boots Purple (Purple 006) 6 UK,Ladies Remonte Casual Flat Shoes * R3510 *,CQ COUTURE CUSTOM ROCK OVERKNEE BOOTS STIEFEL BOOTS LEATHER BELT RED 40,H&M Balmain Welted Ankle Boots In Suede UK5 EU38 JS16 44,Grasshoppers Womens Loafers & SlipOns Black/Grey Herringbone 5 US / 3 UK,Db Shoes Womens Prague Slip On Loafers Wide Fitting Shoes - EV Width (1E - 3E)Ladies Clarks Ballerina Slip On Shoes Style - Feya IslandGentle Souls by Kenneth Cole Women's Brian Mid-Calf Boot with Buckle Detail A...,Gentleman/Lady Lucchese Handcrafted 1883 Mad Dog Cowboy Boots Woman UK6.5 - USA 8.5 Durable service Known for its good quality fine VW1659,Man/Woman Ladies Rieker All Weather Long Boots 98956 New varieties are launched Moderate cost unique VB1795,Ladies Clarks Casual Shoes Glick Resseta High-quality Fast delivery Pick up at the boutique,Jimmy Choo 36,5 Black Suede Ankle Boots, Rare!,LADIES LUXURIOUS FLATS FOR SALE! Customer first Moderate cost Very practicalTiti Couture Womens Mocasin Moccasins Blue (Turquoise Turquoise) 4 UK,Ladies Gold Leather Slip On Feel Good feet Padders Dolly Shoes Roxy,Fly London Luz, Women's Boots Black (Black) 5 UK,Mr/Ms Ladies Van Dal Smart Block Heel Ankle Boot Carrow Exquisite (middle) workmanship King of quantity List of explosions WR1895,Nike Air Max 97 WMNS "Mustard-Mustard-White" All Sizes 3 4 5 6 7 8 Limited Crep,Lemon Jelly Womens Velvety Chelsea Boots Black (Black 11) 6 UK,CULT - CHAUSSURE BLACK/BLUE CORAZZA CLE102272 FW1617,Man's/Woman's Ankle Boot Oto Leather Aesthetic appearance Clearance Fashion dynamic,CQ COUTURE KNEE HIGH CUSTOM COLOUR BOOTS STIEFEL BOOTS LEATHER BROWN BROWN 43,ISABEL MARANT Black Garett Boots FR 37|Dress Sneakers Trainers ShoesVia Spiga Aurora Dress Ankle Boots, Deep Blue, 5 UK Display,GIOHEL DARK PUNK BIKER BOOTS STIEFEL BOOTS LEATHER BUCKLE STUDS BLACK BLACK 42,JOHN RICHMOND EVENING BOOTS , WOW !!!!!,Bugatti Womens 412281736400 T-Bar Heels Blue (Dark Blue 4100) 7 UK,Dublin River Boots NEW Waterproof Leather Dog Walking Long Riding Country BootsMen's/Women's Ankle boot CallagHan bargain Ranked first in its class As of the latest model,Nike Air Max 90 Pinnacle Shoes Black 839612 002,


Justin Reece England Camila Womens Black Suede Suede Black Leather Shoes 0d3689

By Sam Brasch | sam.brasch@cpr.org May 29, 2018

Audio: Sam Brasch discusses proposed changes to the state's Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program

The Mesa County Workforce Center building in 2015. Colorado's counties are opposing a statewide move to increase temporary welfare.

Megan Verlee/CPR News

A state plan to increase cash welfare for the first time in nearly a decade is meeting resistance from Colorado counties.

Their objection lies not with the need for an increase, but how to pay for it.

Colorado's Department of Human Services proposed a 10 percent increase for families that receive cash welfare through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. That amounts to an extra $46 above the current limit of $462 a month for a family with one parent and two kids.

That increase would benefit about 17,000 Colorado households that receive cash assistance each month. An additional 34,500 receive assistance over the course of a year.

There are restrictions on the benefits. Adults must participate in classes or skill-based trainings designed to help them get a job, and no family can receive grants for more than 60 months.

Counties Want To Guard Savings

The issue for counties is the plan to fund the increase. The proposal would force counties to spend the allocation on cash assistance, rather than keeping it in reserves. Counties often store part of their allocation for basic cash assistance to help pay for other programs, like child welfare or childcare assistance.

Julie Krow, executive director for El Paso County Department of Human Services, said both sides agree Colorado’s poorest families could use the help, but she doesn’t think it should come at the expense of other programs.

“Would any parent ever feel comfortable having no savings in the bank to meet their own children’s needs?” Krow said. “We have legal custody of many of the children in our child welfare system. If these children have a critical emergency or an expensive treatment need, it is the county that covers the expense.”

Colorado Counties, Inc., which represents the 64 counties on state issues, has also come out against the planned increased.

The State Sees Underspent Funds

The Colorado Department of Human Services argues counties would not need to tap their reserves. The department estimates the cost of the increase would come to $8.1 million — less than the $10.3 million of TANF money counties socked away during the last fiscal year. In total, Colorado counties have set aside about $50 million in money from the cash welfare program.

“All we are asking is that we use underspent money to help families in deep pockets of poverty,” said Ki’i Powell, executive director of the Office of Economic Security at CDHS.

Colorado last increased the caps for the grants given through its program, known as Colorado Works, in 2009. Even before that, the overall value of the program struggled to keep up with inflation or the cost of living. Since the beginning of the program inception in 1997, the Department of Human Services estimates that the purchasing power of the grants has fallen 35 percent.

Gini Pingenot, legislative director for the Colorado Counties Inc., said many Colorado counties have already committed their TANF reserves for other programs. Data collected by Colorado Counties shows that by year’s end, 15 counties will have zeroed-out their reserves — even without the proposed increase.

“I don’t know how we will fulfill what’s a really laudable effort,” Pingenot said.

The debate comes as Congress considers a new plan for welfare reform. The Republican-led effort would continue the TANF program for five years while allowing states to use more of its welfare funding for child care and job training.

In Colorado, county advocates say the state shouldn’t act before Washington. But those pushing for the increase are worried the lack of action may send the wrong message to Congress.

“They would think we don’t need to fund this program as much as we are when that could not be further from the truth,” said attorney Jack Regenbogen, who has advocated for the increase on behalf the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, an anti-poverty group.

The state Board of Human Services begins debate on the issue at a June 1 meeting.

State Government
Donate To CPR

Support impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery with your monthly gift today.

npr news

NPR Hourly News


CPR Hourly News


CPR's 2018 Voter's Guide

A resource to help you decide how to cast your vote this election season.

Thank You For Joining CPR's Community Of Support

Your gifts strengthen the foundation for impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery in Colorado.

Most Viewed News

Public Insight Network