El Naturalista Womens Nf79 Pleasant Brown Lichen Ankle Boots Brown Pleasant 8 UK db1241

El Naturalista Womens Nf79 Pleasant Brown Lichen Ankle Boots Brown Pleasant 8 UK db1241
elooP leahciM
enaL doowlezaH 061
dleifnE
nodnoL
JH5 31N
modgniK detinU
:enohP5167359377
:liamEmoc.liamelgoog@281leahcim.eloop

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, unworn and undamaged item in its original packaging (such as the original box ... Read moreabout the condition
EAN: Does not apply
Colour: Brown MPN: NF79
Size: 8 UK Brand: El Naturalista
UK Shoe Size (Women's): 8 UK UPC: Does not apply
Update required: To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
Close Player

El Naturalista Womens Nf79 Pleasant Brown Lichen Ankle Boots Brown Pleasant 8 UK db1241

Aerosoles Sawcremento Mule Shoes, Brown, 3.5 UK,Men's/Women's NEVER WORN ODD PAIR HOBBS BLACK SUEDE HIGH CALF ZIP UP BOOTS (1277) High quality and cheap Beautiful Rich on-time delivery RB1231VIC MATIE FOOTWEAR WOMAN BOOT LEATHER BLACK - 0F4F,CHATHAM Women's Sofie Leather Sandal excellent quality Optimal price value,Ladies Clarks Seude and Leather Knee High Boots *Caddy Belle*,Bella Vita Briar II Backless Loafers, Black Velvet, 6 UK,Clarks Ladies Buckled Formal Shoes Hamble ParkZARA GATHERED LEATHER OVER THE KNEE HIGH HEEL BOOTS REF.6014/201 35-41 AW17,Josef Seibel Womens Sandra 06 Boots Red (Wine) 5 UK,Man's/Woman's Brand New Hermes ankle Boots Practical and economical Moderate cost Human border,Kickers Womens Rekia Desert Boots Black(noir) 4 UK,Casual Fashion Slippers Slip ON Ladies Flat Heels Mules Loafers Shoes Suede New,Dublin River Wide Womens Boots Country - Chocolate All Sizes,Ladies Clarks Unstructured Buckle Fastening Flat Leather Shoes - Un Lady2Man's/Woman's Ladies Clarks Block Heel Ankle Boots Jazlyn Berry Comfortable feeling Modern design Suitable for color VG436,Ladies Rieker Open Back Flats Label 46395,Tommy Hilfiger Cozy Warmlined Womens Black Leather & Suede Boots - 37 EU,GEOX YUKI Ladies Womens Soft Leather Casual Slip On Comfort Loafers Shoes Biscui,Gina Black Kid Leather - Ankle Boots Size 3.5Isabel Marant Janette wedge Suede Lether Boots Black Brand New BNIBRIEKER LADIES CASUAL SLIP ON SHOE L3272-45,Dr. Martens Beaumann Jadon Sinclair Bryony,Hades Shoes - Pantera Leopard Print Wedges,ISABEL MARANT WOMEN'S LEATHER HEEL ANKLE BOOTS BOOTIES NEW LAMSY BLACK 9B4,NEW Nike Huarache Run 654275-110 Womens Shoes Trainers Sneakers SALE,GIOHEL PLATFORM OVERKNEE BOOTS STIEFEL BOOTS CORSET STRETCH LEATHER BLACK 43,Carvela Womens Stacey Np Ankle Boots Black (Black) 6 UK,Man/Woman Blowfish Malibu Alms Boots Womens Tall Buckle Detail Winter Heeled Shoes Year-end special promotions Order welcome As of the latest model GG1241,Ted Baker Imme 2 Light Pink Ballet Flats, Rose Gold Bow. Size 7,Think! Womens Denk Desert Boots Brown (Schoko 45) 7 UK,
Streaming

Menu

El Naturalista Womens Nf79 Pleasant Brown Lichen Ankle Boots Brown Pleasant 8 UK db1241

By Sam Brasch | sam.brasch@cpr.org May 29, 2018

Audio: Sam Brasch discusses proposed changes to the state's Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program

The Mesa County Workforce Center building in 2015. Colorado's counties are opposing a statewide move to increase temporary welfare.

Megan Verlee/CPR News

A state plan to increase cash welfare for the first time in nearly a decade is meeting resistance from Colorado counties.

Their objection lies not with the need for an increase, but how to pay for it.

Colorado's Department of Human Services proposed a 10 percent increase for families that receive cash welfare through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. That amounts to an extra $46 above the current limit of $462 a month for a family with one parent and two kids.

That increase would benefit about 17,000 Colorado households that receive cash assistance each month. An additional 34,500 receive assistance over the course of a year.

There are restrictions on the benefits. Adults must participate in classes or skill-based trainings designed to help them get a job, and no family can receive grants for more than 60 months.

Counties Want To Guard Savings

The issue for counties is the plan to fund the increase. The proposal would force counties to spend the allocation on cash assistance, rather than keeping it in reserves. Counties often store part of their allocation for basic cash assistance to help pay for other programs, like child welfare or childcare assistance.

Julie Krow, executive director for El Paso County Department of Human Services, said both sides agree Colorado’s poorest families could use the help, but she doesn’t think it should come at the expense of other programs.

“Would any parent ever feel comfortable having no savings in the bank to meet their own children’s needs?” Krow said. “We have legal custody of many of the children in our child welfare system. If these children have a critical emergency or an expensive treatment need, it is the county that covers the expense.”

Colorado Counties, Inc., which represents the 64 counties on state issues, has also come out against the planned increased.

The State Sees Underspent Funds

The Colorado Department of Human Services argues counties would not need to tap their reserves. The department estimates the cost of the increase would come to $8.1 million — less than the $10.3 million of TANF money counties socked away during the last fiscal year. In total, Colorado counties have set aside about $50 million in money from the cash welfare program.

“All we are asking is that we use underspent money to help families in deep pockets of poverty,” said Ki’i Powell, executive director of the Office of Economic Security at CDHS.

Colorado last increased the caps for the grants given through its program, known as Colorado Works, in 2009. Even before that, the overall value of the program struggled to keep up with inflation or the cost of living. Since the beginning of the program inception in 1997, the Department of Human Services estimates that the purchasing power of the grants has fallen 35 percent.

Gini Pingenot, legislative director for the Colorado Counties Inc., said many Colorado counties have already committed their TANF reserves for other programs. Data collected by Colorado Counties shows that by year’s end, 15 counties will have zeroed-out their reserves — even without the proposed increase.

“I don’t know how we will fulfill what’s a really laudable effort,” Pingenot said.

The debate comes as Congress considers a new plan for welfare reform. The Republican-led effort would continue the TANF program for five years while allowing states to use more of its welfare funding for child care and job training.

In Colorado, county advocates say the state shouldn’t act before Washington. But those pushing for the increase are worried the lack of action may send the wrong message to Congress.

“They would think we don’t need to fund this program as much as we are when that could not be further from the truth,” said attorney Jack Regenbogen, who has advocated for the increase on behalf the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, an anti-poverty group.

The state Board of Human Services begins debate on the issue at a June 1 meeting.

State Government
Donate To CPR

Support impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery with your monthly gift today.

npr news

NPR Hourly News

Listen

CPR Hourly News

Listen

CPR's 2018 Voter's Guide

A resource to help you decide how to cast your vote this election season.

Thank You For Joining CPR's Community Of Support

Your gifts strengthen the foundation for impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery in Colorado.

Most Viewed News

Public Insight Network