FRYE Ray Grommet Tall Black, Knee High Studded Western Boots 901, Black, Tall 6 UK 21564c

FRYE Ray Grommet Tall Black, Knee High Studded Western Boots 901, Black, Tall 6 UK 21564c
rdwD mdA
8 leveL
esuoH etagtseW
etaG tseW
TD1 5W
modgniK detinU

Item specifics

Condition: :
. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller notes: Shoes. Lightly soles. The images shown are of the actual shoes for sale.
UK Shoe Size (Women's): UK 6 Heel Height: Low Heel (0.5-1.5 in.)
Brand: FRYE Exact Heel Height: 1.50
MPN: Ray Grommet Tall Heel Type: Block
Style: Cowboy, Western Width: Standard (B)
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 8 Material: Suede
Pattern: Solid UPC: 190233060022
EAN: Does not apply
Update required: To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
Close Player

FRYE Ray Grommet Tall Black, Knee High Studded Western Boots 901, Black, Tall 6 UK 21564c

Dr Martens 8-Hole Carey Purple 13678500 Original Classic Doc,Oxygen Stitch Down Mary Jane Shoe Sintra Blue Sizes 36 to 41 () RRPCarvela Melody, Womens Ballet Flats Gold (Gold) 6 UK,Zara original Vamp Flat Black Pumps Reputation first Modern design high quality productLadies Padders Ballet Flats Style Fiona -WDr Martens 1914 Vonda II 14-Eyelet Black Leather Boots Pastel Flowers,Man/Woman Ankle Boot Sartori Gold Consumer first Settlement Price Exquisite processing,PACO GIL RED & CRYSTAL FLAT PUMPS, SIZE 4, NEW/UNUSED, BOXED, RRP,PAUL SMITH LADIES HIGH HEELS ANKLE BOOTS (BRAND NEW),Giuseppe Zanotti Grey Leather Wedge Heel Ankle Boots Chunky Boots Shoes Sz,CQ COUTURE CUSTOM NEW OVERKNEE BOOTS STIEFEL BOOTS SHOES LEATHER BLACK BLACK 42Ladies Rieker Slip On Pumps 'L3051' Fashion pattern fashionable Outstanding style,Clarks Candra Blush Womens Flats Grey/suede 5.5 US / 3.5 UK,Nicholas Kirkwood Snakeskin Bow Black Suede Cutout Ankle Boots,Alberto Women's Shoes Ankle Boots | Silver | Fall Winter 18/19,Gianmarco Lorenzi Sand Suede Boots. Product Code - P4D7L0075. Size 36. RRP .Men/Women Alberto Guardiani Somerset black (18AGD) Elegant appearance Year-end sale Speed ​​refund,TRIUMPH Aimilita Dr Martens brown 1914 fur faux lined leather boots,Black 100% leather Isabel Marant ankle boots size 4,Man's/Woman's Ladies Clarks Smart Long Boots Verlie Gail Rich design Stylish and fun Strong heat and heat resistance RV1943,Ladies Clarks Cloudsteppers Flat Casual Sheos Style - Sillian Bella,Buffalo London By Buffalo Brown Leather Platform Knee Boots Zipped Size 4,tory burch flat shoes size 5 Not so expensive product quality Full range of specifications,New Womens Sam Edelman Black Sandy Leather Boots Ankle Zip,New Womens Steve Madden Multi Kera Mule Satin Shoes Flats Slip On,Gant Womens Nicole Chelsea Boots Black (Black G00) 3.5 UK,DSQUARED2 BLACK LEATHER WITH FUR SOLID BOOTS SZ 35,Nike Air Max Plus GS Tn Black Metallic Gold Juniors Girls Boys 655020 069,Gant Womens Jennifer Ankle Boots Black (Black G00) 5.5-6,Gentlemen/Ladies Hanwag Womens BanksGTX Boots Walking Innovative design Ranked first in its class retail price


FRYE Ray Grommet Tall Black, Knee High Studded Western Boots 901, Black, Tall 6 UK 21564c

By Sam Brasch | May 29, 2018

Audio: Sam Brasch discusses proposed changes to the state's Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program

The Mesa County Workforce Center building in 2015. Colorado's counties are opposing a statewide move to increase temporary welfare.

Megan Verlee/CPR News

A state plan to increase cash welfare for the first time in nearly a decade is meeting resistance from Colorado counties.

Their objection lies not with the need for an increase, but how to pay for it.

Colorado's Department of Human Services proposed a 10 percent increase for families that receive cash welfare through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. That amounts to an extra $46 above the current limit of $462 a month for a family with one parent and two kids.

That increase would benefit about 17,000 Colorado households that receive cash assistance each month. An additional 34,500 receive assistance over the course of a year.

There are restrictions on the benefits. Adults must participate in classes or skill-based trainings designed to help them get a job, and no family can receive grants for more than 60 months.

Counties Want To Guard Savings

The issue for counties is the plan to fund the increase. The proposal would force counties to spend the allocation on cash assistance, rather than keeping it in reserves. Counties often store part of their allocation for basic cash assistance to help pay for other programs, like child welfare or childcare assistance.

Julie Krow, executive director for El Paso County Department of Human Services, said both sides agree Colorado’s poorest families could use the help, but she doesn’t think it should come at the expense of other programs.

“Would any parent ever feel comfortable having no savings in the bank to meet their own children’s needs?” Krow said. “We have legal custody of many of the children in our child welfare system. If these children have a critical emergency or an expensive treatment need, it is the county that covers the expense.”

Colorado Counties, Inc., which represents the 64 counties on state issues, has also come out against the planned increased.

The State Sees Underspent Funds

The Colorado Department of Human Services argues counties would not need to tap their reserves. The department estimates the cost of the increase would come to $8.1 million — less than the $10.3 million of TANF money counties socked away during the last fiscal year. In total, Colorado counties have set aside about $50 million in money from the cash welfare program.

“All we are asking is that we use underspent money to help families in deep pockets of poverty,” said Ki’i Powell, executive director of the Office of Economic Security at CDHS.

Colorado last increased the caps for the grants given through its program, known as Colorado Works, in 2009. Even before that, the overall value of the program struggled to keep up with inflation or the cost of living. Since the beginning of the program inception in 1997, the Department of Human Services estimates that the purchasing power of the grants has fallen 35 percent.

Gini Pingenot, legislative director for the Colorado Counties Inc., said many Colorado counties have already committed their TANF reserves for other programs. Data collected by Colorado Counties shows that by year’s end, 15 counties will have zeroed-out their reserves — even without the proposed increase.

“I don’t know how we will fulfill what’s a really laudable effort,” Pingenot said.

The debate comes as Congress considers a new plan for welfare reform. The Republican-led effort would continue the TANF program for five years while allowing states to use more of its welfare funding for child care and job training.

In Colorado, county advocates say the state shouldn’t act before Washington. But those pushing for the increase are worried the lack of action may send the wrong message to Congress.

“They would think we don’t need to fund this program as much as we are when that could not be further from the truth,” said attorney Jack Regenbogen, who has advocated for the increase on behalf the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, an anti-poverty group.

The state Board of Human Services begins debate on the issue at a June 1 meeting.

State Government
Donate To CPR

Support impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery with your monthly gift today.

npr news

NPR Hourly News


CPR Hourly News


CPR's 2018 Voter's Guide

A resource to help you decide how to cast your vote this election season.

Thank You For Joining CPR's Community Of Support

Your gifts strengthen the foundation for impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery in Colorado.

Most Viewed News

Public Insight Network