Ladies Suede Spanish Riding Boots in in in Chocolate 8b66be

Ladies Suede Spanish Riding Boots in in in Chocolate 8b66be
senoJ drawdE
truoC eromniL 6
etatsE lairtsudnI notxerhT
nottaW
klofroN
GN6 52PI
modgniK detinU
:enohP8934995157
:liamEmoc.stekcajrennid@de

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, unworn and undamaged item in its original packaging (such as the original box ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Vestey of London
Heel Type: Block Style: Knee High Boots
Lining: 100 Leather Main Colour: Brown
Sole: 100 Leather Upper Material: Suede
Occasion: Formal Exact Heel Height: 0.5
EAN: 5055342318615 Fastening: Zip
Update required: To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
Close Player

Ladies Suede Spanish Riding Boots in in in Chocolate 8b66be

Gentlemen/Ladies Clarks Ladies Leather Zip Up Ankle Boots 'Carleta Paris' BLACK D Crazy price special function Breathable shoes NB1033,I35 Beverley Riding Boots, Cognac, 3 UK,Clarks Ladies Slip On Bow Detailed Ballet Shoes Arizona Heat,Man/Woman WINDRIVER SNOWDRIFT HD2 WATER-RESISTANT SHELL WINTER BOOT SAND Complete specification Comfortable touch Human border BH141Dr Martens 7 Hole Evan Black Silver Skull 14645016 Original Doc,**CÉLINE** RED WHITE MISMATCH POPPY GLOVE ANKLE BOOTIES BOOTS,Mr/Ms SHOES HELLY HANSEN THE FOREST BLU-10½ Every item described is available high quality Fine wildRieker Womens 49357 Loafers Beige (Crema/Ice) 3.5 UK,Rieker Ladies Summer Shoes 464H0 the most convenient Orders are welcome a lot of varietiesWomen's boots leather model KATYA HIGH by HGilliane Design to 9.5Ladies Rieker Ballerina Flats - L8357 bargain fashionable Speed ​​refund,PANTANETTI Women's Shoes Boots 11826H Nappa Horse Timo Zanna 912 Nero Leather IT,Rieker Womens 43076 Closed Toe Ballet Flats, Beige Beige (Nude 62) 7.5 UKGentlemen/Ladies Red Valentino Women's Shoes Ankle Boots | Black | Fall Winter 18/19 the most convenient Orders are welcome Contrary to the same paragraph WV2923,Ladies Skechers Walking Shoes Go Walk 13510women's shoes CINZIA SOFT 3 () moccasins grey suede BX317-36,Nike Air Max 97 GS Black White Juniors Girls Boys Womens Trainers 921552 001,Black Givenchy Elegant studded leather ankle boots - SIZEJustin Reece England Skylar Womens Black Leather Matt Ankle Boots UK Size 3 - 8,Dolce & Gabbana Black Mocassino ShoesFree People Paradiso Suede Wrap Knee Boots. UK Size 5. RRP . Only .99Hush Puppies JANESSA Ladies Womens Slip On Leather Court Ballerina Pump Shoes,Yves Saint Laurent YSL Black Gold Trim Bootie Boots 38.5 BNWB,Kickers Mila, Women’s Desert Boots Schwarz (Noir Trche Grise) 6 UK,Fly Loundon Duke941Fly Womens Boots Sludge/Olive 7.5 US / 5.5 UK,Man/Woman Ladies Cipriata Leather Twin Gusset Boots Waxy Crazy Horse Leather Elegant shape Elegant and sturdy packaging Official website VB80,Andrea Conti Women's 0022708 Cold Lined Long Boots Black (Schwarz 002) 5 UK,ara Womens Kansas-St Boots Brown (Lava,moro 68) 5 UK,L.K. Bennet Amanda Pointed-Toe Ankle Boots, Black, 4.5 UKDesigner boots size 4 NEW ROCK,
Streaming

Menu

Ladies Suede Spanish Riding Boots in in in Chocolate 8b66be

By Sam Brasch | sam.brasch@cpr.org May 29, 2018

Audio: Sam Brasch discusses proposed changes to the state's Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program

The Mesa County Workforce Center building in 2015. Colorado's counties are opposing a statewide move to increase temporary welfare.

Megan Verlee/CPR News

A state plan to increase cash welfare for the first time in nearly a decade is meeting resistance from Colorado counties.

Their objection lies not with the need for an increase, but how to pay for it.

Colorado's Department of Human Services proposed a 10 percent increase for families that receive cash welfare through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. That amounts to an extra $46 above the current limit of $462 a month for a family with one parent and two kids.

That increase would benefit about 17,000 Colorado households that receive cash assistance each month. An additional 34,500 receive assistance over the course of a year.

There are restrictions on the benefits. Adults must participate in classes or skill-based trainings designed to help them get a job, and no family can receive grants for more than 60 months.

Counties Want To Guard Savings

The issue for counties is the plan to fund the increase. The proposal would force counties to spend the allocation on cash assistance, rather than keeping it in reserves. Counties often store part of their allocation for basic cash assistance to help pay for other programs, like child welfare or childcare assistance.

Julie Krow, executive director for El Paso County Department of Human Services, said both sides agree Colorado’s poorest families could use the help, but she doesn’t think it should come at the expense of other programs.

“Would any parent ever feel comfortable having no savings in the bank to meet their own children’s needs?” Krow said. “We have legal custody of many of the children in our child welfare system. If these children have a critical emergency or an expensive treatment need, it is the county that covers the expense.”

Colorado Counties, Inc., which represents the 64 counties on state issues, has also come out against the planned increased.

The State Sees Underspent Funds

The Colorado Department of Human Services argues counties would not need to tap their reserves. The department estimates the cost of the increase would come to $8.1 million — less than the $10.3 million of TANF money counties socked away during the last fiscal year. In total, Colorado counties have set aside about $50 million in money from the cash welfare program.

“All we are asking is that we use underspent money to help families in deep pockets of poverty,” said Ki’i Powell, executive director of the Office of Economic Security at CDHS.

Colorado last increased the caps for the grants given through its program, known as Colorado Works, in 2009. Even before that, the overall value of the program struggled to keep up with inflation or the cost of living. Since the beginning of the program inception in 1997, the Department of Human Services estimates that the purchasing power of the grants has fallen 35 percent.

Gini Pingenot, legislative director for the Colorado Counties Inc., said many Colorado counties have already committed their TANF reserves for other programs. Data collected by Colorado Counties shows that by year’s end, 15 counties will have zeroed-out their reserves — even without the proposed increase.

“I don’t know how we will fulfill what’s a really laudable effort,” Pingenot said.

The debate comes as Congress considers a new plan for welfare reform. The Republican-led effort would continue the TANF program for five years while allowing states to use more of its welfare funding for child care and job training.

In Colorado, county advocates say the state shouldn’t act before Washington. But those pushing for the increase are worried the lack of action may send the wrong message to Congress.

“They would think we don’t need to fund this program as much as we are when that could not be further from the truth,” said attorney Jack Regenbogen, who has advocated for the increase on behalf the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, an anti-poverty group.

The state Board of Human Services begins debate on the issue at a June 1 meeting.

State Government
Donate To CPR

Support impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery with your monthly gift today.

npr news

NPR Hourly News

Listen

CPR Hourly News

Listen

CPR's 2018 Voter's Guide

A resource to help you decide how to cast your vote this election season.

Thank You For Joining CPR's Community Of Support

Your gifts strengthen the foundation for impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery in Colorado.

Most Viewed News

Public Insight Network