Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4

Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: 你 in its original packaging (such as the original box ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Kurt Geiger London
Toe Style: Pointed Modified Item: No
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 9 Heel Height: High (3 to 4 1/4)
UK Shoe Size (Women's): UK 7 Exact Heel Height: 4.3 Inches
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 40 Material: Leather, Textile
Pattern: Multi-Coloured Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy
Occasion: Evening & Party Style: Court Shoes
Heel Type: Slim Lining: 100% Leather
Sole: 100% Leather Fastening: Slip On
Main Colour: Red Size Type: Regular
EAN: Does not apply
Update required: To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
Close Player

Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4

womens shoes FEMME PLUS 6 () sandals green suede strass BX722-39,Versace 19.69 3105124 VELLUTO BLU ROYAL Décolleté Shoes Women's Dark Blue UKJimmy Choo Gold Sheepskin Flat Boots Size 39 1/2,Walter Steiger Black Platforms 8US 38EU Wedge Sandals White Dots High Heel NIB,Gentleman/Lady Sophia webster shoes Rich design Elegant and sturdy packaging a lot of varieties,Bally Black Court Shoes Size 4.5 (Eur 37.5) Leather Pumps Made In Italy,Men's/Women's BLACK-RED LATEX RUBBER FETISH BOOTS SIZE 4-12- HEELS 5,5"- PRODUCER- POLAND Diverse new design Lush design Elegant and stable packaging VG1132,Men/Women Trotters Womens lola Closed Toe Classic Pumps Elegant shape The highest quality material Quality and consumer first WB465,Oxitaly Womens Sevan 110 Ankle Strap Sandals 39 EU,Irregular Choice Round Up Gang BNIB size 5/38,Man's/Woman's Diesel Studded Black Court Shoes Outstanding features special function fine,Manolo Blahnik Traspuesto 105 Pink Satin [ 76% OFF RRP ],Gianmarco Lorenzi Black Suede Heel Wedges. A4D1B0560. Various Sizes. RRP .Alexander Mcqueen Gold Strappy Sandals /39 Ladies Box Authentic,Men's/Women's Womens Ladies Camper Beth Mary Jane Black Low Block Heel Leather Shoes Size Innovative design Orders are welcome Rich on-time delivery BW1178Schutz Womens S2-00600001nbk Closed Toe Heels Beige (Toasted Toasted) 6 UK,CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN HEELS PIGALLE 100 PATENT SIZE 6.5,Steve Madden Women, Clogs and Mules, groovii Denim 7 UK,Designer Stella McCartney Elise Women High Platform Shoes UK Size 7.5 / 40.5Petite Mendigote Womens Nahia Suede Sling Back Sandals Red (Paprika Pap) 6 UK,Gentleman/Lady Sophia Webster Pineapple Sandals Size 37.5 Rich design Make full use of materials Fashion dynamic,Designer Camilla Skovgaard Stiletto Pumps Nude Calf Leather UK Size 6 EU Size 39Men/Women Ladies Remonte Block Heel Casual Trouser Shoes D7314 Every item described is available Latest styles Various latest designs RG968,NEW/ UNWORN Catherine dé Medici 1533 Metallic Heels (Green & Gold, 37),HGL Womens 5-10 0007 0300 Closed Toe Ballet Flats White (Perlweiß 0300) 6 UKGENUINE CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN STRAPPY HEELS SIZE 5 BNWB,Man's/Woman's marc jacobs Heels Size 40 superior a wide range of products Maintenance capability,Christian Louboutin Lucifer Bow Pumps 50 Red Leather Pump 37 RRP,Stella McCartney Daphne court shoes high heels size 37.5, new with box,AUTHENTIC LUXURY PRADA PUMPS SHOES 1X296F RED NEW 36 36,5,
Streaming

Menu

Kurt Geiger Red London Bond Shoes Size 7 Red Geiger Jacquard High Heel Court RRP a32bb4

By Sam Brasch | sam.brasch@cpr.org May 29, 2018

Audio: Sam Brasch discusses proposed changes to the state's Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program

The Mesa County Workforce Center building in 2015. Colorado's counties are opposing a statewide move to increase temporary welfare.

Megan Verlee/CPR News

A state plan to increase cash welfare for the first time in nearly a decade is meeting resistance from Colorado counties.

Their objection lies not with the need for an increase, but how to pay for it.

Colorado's Department of Human Services proposed a 10 percent increase for families that receive cash welfare through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. That amounts to an extra $46 above the current limit of $462 a month for a family with one parent and two kids.

That increase would benefit about 17,000 Colorado households that receive cash assistance each month. An additional 34,500 receive assistance over the course of a year.

There are restrictions on the benefits. Adults must participate in classes or skill-based trainings designed to help them get a job, and no family can receive grants for more than 60 months.

Counties Want To Guard Savings

The issue for counties is the plan to fund the increase. The proposal would force counties to spend the allocation on cash assistance, rather than keeping it in reserves. Counties often store part of their allocation for basic cash assistance to help pay for other programs, like child welfare or childcare assistance.

Julie Krow, executive director for El Paso County Department of Human Services, said both sides agree Colorado’s poorest families could use the help, but she doesn’t think it should come at the expense of other programs.

“Would any parent ever feel comfortable having no savings in the bank to meet their own children’s needs?” Krow said. “We have legal custody of many of the children in our child welfare system. If these children have a critical emergency or an expensive treatment need, it is the county that covers the expense.”

Colorado Counties, Inc., which represents the 64 counties on state issues, has also come out against the planned increased.

The State Sees Underspent Funds

The Colorado Department of Human Services argues counties would not need to tap their reserves. The department estimates the cost of the increase would come to $8.1 million — less than the $10.3 million of TANF money counties socked away during the last fiscal year. In total, Colorado counties have set aside about $50 million in money from the cash welfare program.

“All we are asking is that we use underspent money to help families in deep pockets of poverty,” said Ki’i Powell, executive director of the Office of Economic Security at CDHS.

Colorado last increased the caps for the grants given through its program, known as Colorado Works, in 2009. Even before that, the overall value of the program struggled to keep up with inflation or the cost of living. Since the beginning of the program inception in 1997, the Department of Human Services estimates that the purchasing power of the grants has fallen 35 percent.

Gini Pingenot, legislative director for the Colorado Counties Inc., said many Colorado counties have already committed their TANF reserves for other programs. Data collected by Colorado Counties shows that by year’s end, 15 counties will have zeroed-out their reserves — even without the proposed increase.

“I don’t know how we will fulfill what’s a really laudable effort,” Pingenot said.

The debate comes as Congress considers a new plan for welfare reform. The Republican-led effort would continue the TANF program for five years while allowing states to use more of its welfare funding for child care and job training.

In Colorado, county advocates say the state shouldn’t act before Washington. But those pushing for the increase are worried the lack of action may send the wrong message to Congress.

“They would think we don’t need to fund this program as much as we are when that could not be further from the truth,” said attorney Jack Regenbogen, who has advocated for the increase on behalf the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, an anti-poverty group.

The state Board of Human Services begins debate on the issue at a June 1 meeting.

State Government
Donate To CPR

Support impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery with your monthly gift today.

npr news

NPR Hourly News

Listen

CPR Hourly News

Listen

CPR's 2018 Voter's Guide

A resource to help you decide how to cast your vote this election season.

Thank You For Joining CPR's Community Of Support

Your gifts strengthen the foundation for impartial journalism, music exploration and discovery in Colorado.

Most Viewed News

Public Insight Network